Animal-Based Diet vs Carnivore: What’s the Difference?
The key difference is that carnivore eliminates all plant foods while animal-based includes select plants — primarily fruit, honey, and raw dairy alongside meat and organs. Strict carnivore is an elimination protocol that removes every non-animal food. The animal-based diet, created by Paul Saladino MD, keeps animal foods as the foundation but adds back plant foods he considers low in defense chemicals. Both prioritize animal nutrition, but they differ significantly in food variety, carbohydrate content, and who they suit best.
What Is the Animal-Based Diet?
Paul Saladino, a physician and author of “The Carnivore Code,” developed the animal-based framework after years of following strict carnivore himself. His position evolved: while he maintained that animal foods should be the nutritional foundation, he concluded that certain plant foods — specifically those designed by nature to be eaten (fruits) rather than plants defending themselves with toxins (seeds, leaves, roots) — could be beneficial additions.
The animal-based diet includes:
Animal foods (the foundation):
- All meats, especially ruminant (beef, lamb, bison)
- Organ meats (liver, heart, kidney) — heavily emphasized
- Fish and shellfish
- Eggs
- Animal fats (tallow, lard, butter, ghee)
Select plant additions:
- Fruit — berries, citrus, tropical fruits, apples, stone fruits
- Honey — raw, unprocessed
- Raw dairy — raw milk, raw cheese, raw cream (if tolerated)
- Squash — some versions include low-toxin squash
Still excluded:
- Grains and legumes
- Nuts and seeds
- Leafy greens and cruciferous vegetables
- Seed oils and processed foods
- Refined sugar and artificial sweeteners
The logic is based on plant defense chemistry. Seeds, leaves, and roots contain high concentrations of defense chemicals (lectins, oxalates, phytates, goitrogens) because the plant does not want those parts eaten. Fruit, by contrast, is designed to be consumed — the plant benefits from animals eating fruit and dispersing seeds.
How Do the Diets Compare Side by Side?
| Aspect | Strict Carnivore | Animal-Based |
|---|---|---|
| Carbohydrates | Near zero | 50-150g+ daily from fruit and honey |
| Food variety | Limited to animal foods | Moderate — animals + fruit + honey |
| Ketosis | Yes, consistently | Variable — may exit ketosis with fruit |
| Elimination power | Maximum | Moderate — fruit and dairy can trigger |
| Simplicity | Very simple | More planning required |
| Social eating | Difficult | Slightly easier with fruit included |
| Athletic performance | Adapts over 6-12 weeks | Carbs available for glycolytic efforts |
| Organ emphasis | Recommended | Strongly emphasized |
| Cost | Moderate | Higher (quality fruit + raw dairy) |
| Nutrient density | High from animal foods | Very high with organs + fruit |
Who Should Choose Strict Carnivore?
Strict carnivore is the better choice if you:
Need an elimination protocol. If you have autoimmune conditions, chronic inflammation, unresolved digestive issues, or suspected food sensitivities, starting with strict carnivore (or even the lion diet) gives you the cleanest possible baseline. You cannot identify food triggers if you are still eating multiple food categories.
Thrive on simplicity. Some people find freedom in fewer choices. Strict carnivore removes all food decisions — you eat meat, eggs, and animal fats. There is no temptation to overeat fruit, no need to source raw dairy, no questions about which plants are “safe.” Read about the complete rules for this approach.
Are managing sugar or carbohydrate addiction. Fruit and honey, while natural, still trigger insulin and dopamine responses. For people who struggle with carbohydrate cravings or have a history of disordered eating around sweet foods, strict carnivore provides a cleaner break.
Want maximum autophagy and ketosis benefits. Staying in consistent ketosis supports autophagy (cellular cleanup), which some people prioritize for anti-aging or neurological benefits. Adding fruit and honey disrupts sustained ketosis.
Who Should Choose Animal-Based?
The animal-based approach works well if you:
Have already completed an elimination phase. If you have done 30 to 90 days of strict carnivore, identified your triggers, and want to expand your diet thoughtfully, animal-based provides a structured framework for adding foods back. This is the most common transition path.
Are a high-performance athlete. While carnivore athletes adapt over time, some sports — particularly high-intensity glycolytic activities like CrossFit, sprinting, or competitive team sports — benefit from some dietary carbohydrate. Fruit and honey provide that without the inflammatory load of grains.
Tolerate fruit and dairy well. Some people feel genuinely better with some carbohydrates. If you have tested fruit and honey during reintroduction and experienced no negative symptoms, including them can improve quality of life and dietary satisfaction.
Want to include raw dairy. If you tolerate raw dairy (many people who react to pasteurized dairy do fine with raw), the animal-based framework makes this a natural addition. Raw dairy provides beneficial bacteria, enzymes, and additional fat-soluble vitamins.
Are concerned about long-term micronutrient variety. While strict carnivore provides excellent nutrition — especially with organ meats — some people feel more comfortable adding fruit for vitamin C, potassium, and phytonutrients.
What Are the Pros and Cons of Each?
Strict Carnivore — Pros
- Maximum elimination power for identifying food sensitivities
- Simplest possible food decisions
- Consistent ketosis for metabolic benefits
- Strong appetite regulation without carb-driven hunger
- Well-documented health benefits
Strict Carnivore — Cons
- Limited food variety can be socially isolating
- Athletic performance may dip during adaptation
- Some people feel low-energy without any carbohydrates long-term
- Restrictive nature can be psychologically challenging
Animal-Based — Pros
- More dietary variety and flexibility
- Carbohydrates available for athletic performance
- Easier social eating with fruit included
- Higher overall micronutrient diversity
- More sustainable for many people long-term
Animal-Based — Cons
- Fruit and honey can reignite sugar cravings in some people
- Raw dairy is expensive and difficult to source in many areas
- More complex food decisions than strict carnivore
- Not a true elimination diet — harder to identify triggers
- May prevent ketosis for those who want it
Can You Transition Between Them?
Absolutely, and this is the most common approach:
Path 1: Carnivore First, Then Animal-Based
Start with 30 to 90 days of strict carnivore to establish your baseline and allow adaptation. Then systematically add animal-based foods one at a time:
- Start with small amounts of berries (lowest sugar fruit)
- Add raw honey (one tablespoon daily)
- Introduce other fruits (banana, mango, citrus)
- Try raw dairy if available (start with butter, then cheese, then milk)
Monitor your body’s response to each addition for 5 to 7 days before adding the next. This way, you know exactly which foods work for you and which do not.
Path 2: Animal-Based First, Then Strict Carnivore
Some people start animal-based and later tighten to strict carnivore when they want to troubleshoot persistent symptoms. Removing fruit, honey, and dairy for 30 days while keeping the meat foundation can reveal whether those additions were causing subtle issues.
Path 3: Seasonal Cycling
Some long-term practitioners cycle between approaches seasonally — stricter in winter (aligning with ancestral food availability patterns) and more animal-based in summer when fruit is abundant and fresh. There are no rules requiring you to pick one and stay forever.
How Does Honey Fit Into the Picture?
Honey is one of the most debated additions in the carnivore-adjacent world. On strict carnivore, honey is excluded because it is not an animal food (it is processed plant nectar). On animal-based, honey is embraced as a natural carbohydrate source.
Saladino argues that honey has been consumed by humans for tens of thousands of years and contains unique compounds (enzymes, pollen, propolis) that may benefit health. It also provides readily available glucose for athletic performance and thyroid function.
The practical reality: honey is a concentrated sugar source. If you have a history of sugar dependency, including honey can reignite cravings. If you tolerate it well and use it strategically (pre-workout, post-workout, or in small daily amounts), it can be a useful addition.
Which Approach Gets Better Results?
Results depend entirely on your goals:
For autoimmune conditions: Strict carnivore (or lion diet) consistently produces the best outcomes because it eliminates the most potential triggers.
For weight loss: Both work well. Strict carnivore often produces faster initial results due to ketosis and strong appetite suppression. Animal-based can be equally effective if total food intake remains appropriate.
For athletic performance: Animal-based has an edge for high-intensity sports due to available carbohydrates. Strict carnivore works well for endurance and strength sports after full adaptation.
For long-term sustainability: This is individual. Some people eat strict carnivore for years happily. Others need the variety of animal-based. The best approach is the one you will actually maintain.
For simplicity: Strict carnivore wins decisively. Fewer foods means fewer decisions, less shopping complexity, and no temptation to overeat on sweet foods. See our carnivore meal plan for how simple daily eating can be.
The honest answer is that both approaches are dramatically healthier than a standard processed food diet. Whether you eat strict carnivore or animal-based, you have eliminated seed oils, refined grains, processed sugar, and artificial ingredients — which is where the majority of health benefits come from.
For more educational content on the carnivore lifestyle, visit our complete carnivore diet guide.